I Need a Three Course MMO

Tuesday 01 December, 2009 at 3:30 pm Steve "Slurms" Lichtsinn 5

3cmToday I want to talk about a balance that I seem to require in gaming. When I was little Steve, knee-high to a carnie, I played the usual console games. I had great times playing things like Final Fantasy, Zelda and any action game I could get my hands on. But nothing was as sweet as when a friend would come over and try to best me at Street Fighter 2. Fighting games, for the longest time, were my only way to go head to head with a human opponent in gaming. Time went on and more fighting games were released. I was never super fond of the Mortal Kombat series, but I thoroughly enjoyed 2D fighters like Guilty Gear and any of the Capcom or SNK games as well as 3D fighters like Tekken and Soul Calibur. When I finally got into PC Gaming in the late 90’s, a new world was opened to me, namely First Person Shooters. Now, I had played Godeneye on the Nintendo 64 with friends before, but this didn’t compare to playing games like Quake, Unreal, or Jedi Knight. It was personally as if I was a gaming virgin before, and I was making sweet sweet love for the first time with the PC.

I still play shooters quite a bit (by the way, we play TF2 every Monday at 9, join us on Steam!). Even though the controls and graphics have taken massive leaps on console shooters, I feel that they, Real Time Strategy games, and MMO’s are still what make PC gaming unique.

When I started playing Everquest, I fell in love with a new style of gaming; MMO’s. It wasn’t that “first time” experience like I had with the FPS’s, but it did things the other games didn’t, and it felt good. After the first few months in EQ, I began to wonder why there wasn’t a better implementation of PvP in the game. The game seemed to be made for it what with the factions all hating each other and all. Once I began to question this, it started to act as a cancer for my love of the game. I enjoyed what was made, but I felt like I wasn’t showing my abilities as a player by simply crawling through a dungeon with a group. Being someone who was raised on fighting games rather than Dungeons and Dragons, I didn’t fully “get it”. Eventually Dark Age of Camelot was released and showed me what I was missing. It was every bit as great on the game play side as Everquest was, but now with RvR! DAoC was great, but eventually the game changed enough from what I loved about it, that I had to move on.

Since that game, I’ve played numerous other MMO’s, and nothing has really offered me exactly what I want. Currently, I’m playing Lord of the Rings Online. I have yet to check out the Monster Play feature, but I knew going into the game, that it wasn’t touted as having the end all PvP experience. Only reason I have not checked out Monster Play yet, is because I’m having such a damn fine time playing my Warden. But I still have this desire to best others in combat, so what do I do? I play Team Fortress 2 and Uncharted 2 multiplayer to quench my thirst. I can remember doing this in my EQ and WoW days as well. There wasn’t enough of a PvP experience for me, so I balanced my gaming diet with the shooter food group.  Looking back at Warhammer Online, I didn’t play a lot of other games while I was subbed. Sure, WAR had…er, has problems, but for me it was a full game. It was the whole meal, but the problem was the long term health effects it had.

A lot of us in the Multiplaying group are in a rough spot with MMO’s right now. As Brian put it last night in chat, “this is a really weird time for MMO’s”. At least for a lot of us, he’s right. There’s so many titles out right now that do most of what we want, but they aren’t the whole meal. For me, it’s the lack of good PvP. For others it might be that the game doesn’t offer a good leveling experience, or the combat system, controls, graphics or classes offered simply aren’t up your alley. As unique as people are, so are their issues with each title.

For now though, I’ll just keep trucking on LotRO, try out other MMO’s (damn you Shannon) as trials pop up, and keep my eyes open for a three course meal of an MMO that won’t give me a belly ache.

Question for the reader: What are you missing from your current MMO?



Related Posts



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  • Winin-on-the-road says:

    These days, it often boils down to whatever game my brother, dad, and sister-in-law can all agree on. Right now that is Shayia, which has a lot of nice features for a group of casual players. I’m also toying with EVE. It is fun and has skill training that continues while you are offline. All things equal, I need a game with a world that is fun to explore.

  • Rer says:

    If Aion revamps its PvP (Player Made-City Sieges from Video would more than do it for me) and Lowers t3h grind, it will be fantastic… until Global Agenda comes out, then I’ll probably have an “accident” resulting in a divorce with Aion.

  • Cavallina says:

    I agree, this is a weird spot for MMO’s. I currently have three active subscriptions to different ones and none are giving me what I am looking for. SO, I bounce around with all three and sometimes I feel like I’m just killing time and not there for the experience. I’m with you Slurms, when you find that three course meal let me know and I’ll bring the bottle of wine!

  • Tak says:

    The amount of game whores in this guild astound me

    Have you no decency!?

  • Winin-on-the-road says:

    I think MMO pvp can’t really be made satisfying. I like a fair fight where skill determines the outcome. Zerg vs small group, high level vs low, etc. aren’t fun. So mostly I satisfy my gaming needs with a good pve mmo and a FPS shooter. For a long time I played EQ and TFC. Camelot’s system worked pretty well and was fun, especially on the big military actions. That is fun in a different way than TF, but its like raiding vs. dungeon crawling. Fun now and then, but I don’t want to do it every night.

  • 5 comments

    1. Winin-on-the-road Comment:December 1, 2009 at 7:49 pm

      These days, it often boils down to whatever game my brother, dad, and sister-in-law can all agree on. Right now that is Shayia, which has a lot of nice features for a group of casual players. I’m also toying with EVE. It is fun and has skill training that continues while you are offline. All things equal, I need a game with a world that is fun to explore.


    2. Rer Comment:December 1, 2009 at 7:59 pm

      If Aion revamps its PvP (Player Made-City Sieges from Video would more than do it for me) and Lowers t3h grind, it will be fantastic… until Global Agenda comes out, then I’ll probably have an “accident” resulting in a divorce with Aion.


    3. Cavallina Comment:December 1, 2009 at 8:07 pm

      I agree, this is a weird spot for MMO’s. I currently have three active subscriptions to different ones and none are giving me what I am looking for. SO, I bounce around with all three and sometimes I feel like I’m just killing time and not there for the experience. I’m with you Slurms, when you find that three course meal let me know and I’ll bring the bottle of wine!


    4. Tak Comment:December 1, 2009 at 10:42 pm

      The amount of game whores in this guild astound me

      Have you no decency!?


    5. Winin-on-the-road Comment:December 2, 2009 at 11:27 am

      I think MMO pvp can’t really be made satisfying. I like a fair fight where skill determines the outcome. Zerg vs small group, high level vs low, etc. aren’t fun. So mostly I satisfy my gaming needs with a good pve mmo and a FPS shooter. For a long time I played EQ and TFC. Camelot’s system worked pretty well and was fun, especially on the big military actions. That is fun in a different way than TF, but its like raiding vs. dungeon crawling. Fun now and then, but I don’t want to do it every night.


    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Please fill the required fields...

    You may use: <a href="" title=""></a> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>.