Shaddup And Just Enjoy The Game!

Tuesday 14 September, 2010 at 1:11 am Rer 5
theinternetisserious

I can’t help but feel that lately gamers as a community are over analyzing things.  I’m guessing this is a direct result of all of our “past failures” (and I’m using the term failure very loosely) in the gaming industry, specifically with MMOs.

Note: It has just bothered to re-enter my short attention span as to where I first saw an article similiar to this.  You know, the one a few days before this one.. on this site… written by Slurms.  Whoops.  Ah well, nothing like positive reinforcement right?!  Honestly, you can skip over mine and read his, I think he gets the point across better anyways.  I’m just glad you’re here reading the stuff we post either way.

I can understand the whole “fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me” mentality we’ve come to adapt with skepticism towards games.  I myself just recently used that argument when discussing Aion’s *hiss* new expansion.  That said, I think we’ve come to a point where we need to draw a line and say “This is just ridiculous”.  Both Slurms and Syp seem to have a similiar viewpoint to my own.

The new games aren’t bad, they’re great in a new way. Times change, games change. Maybe we should care less about the “MMO” label and just treat each game individually. – Slurms

The inspiration behind this post is Heartless Gamer’s Dissection of Firefall’s Gameplay Video.  The post itself is harmless, and actually very well done.  In the comments section however.. we get stuff like this.  ”Looks good, but I’m not a fan of the setting. Apart from that I never play F2P” or “The game made me want to play Borderlands and Mass Effect 2 more, but F2P sounds a bit fishy for what I saw. Is it going to be lacking content, depth, anything to do but kill bug… What’s the catch?”  Now to be clear, I’m not trying to pick on these two gentlemen by any means.  That said, it seems like gamers have adapted an overly profound sense of skepticism towards F2P games.  Heartless sums up my thoughts nicely in his response.

Why does there have to be a catch with Firefall? There are plenty of examples of F2P games that offer plenty of content and are easily on par with subscription/box-price games in terms of quality.  If there is a “catch” at all, it’s everyone calling it an MMO (but really thinking of WoW when they say that).

Its fair to say that in the past we’ve had our share of free to play games that have either been “pay to win” or “secretly pay to play”.  Yet look only a month back, suddenly now we’ve got GA, EQ2X, DDO, LOTRO, and many other very popular games either converting to the F2P model or starting out that way to begin with.  I think its about time that we as a community put aside our past disappointments with F2P games and give new ones a chance.  If they’re free, who gives a damn if you go in with either high or low expectations of the game?  If it’s fun, you’ll keep playing it.  If not, the only thing you’ve lost is a little time, and you move on.  It doesn’t have to be this complicated!

Heartless Gamers’ comment is also a great lead into my next point of discussion.  Is the argument about whether Firefall is a “true MMO” or not even important?  Honestly, I think its even more stupid than debating politics with your polar opposite.  Is the label of MMO going to determine whether you play and enjoy the game?  If it does, then why do you even play games?  Since when do labels supersede fun in gaming?  Maybe I missed that memo about a year ago, but in the long run it really shouldn’t matter.  Grimnir brought up a great example when I was discussing this article with him.  Diablo II isn’t widely considered to be an MMO, and yet people still to this day argue that it can be, and that Diablo III should be recognized as such.

“Look back at our roots fellow gamers.  Now, let me be clear.  I’m not saying we should all stop typing to one another and completely close all discourses about these subjects, I love a good debate.  I just feel we are losing sight of what really matters with gaming, the three F’s if you will.  Friends, fun, and freedom.  Thank you my fellow Americans, and God Bless Video Games.” – Probably What President Obama Would Say If He Was A Gamer

Now stop reading this and go play a game you enjoy playing simply because its fun!  Mush!



Related Posts

Naming Your Guild
Suppressing My Vulgarity: Letter A
Won’t Be Fooled Again (I hope…)
Family + Gaming = Awesome


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  • Sezco says:

    There are tons of free games to choose from that could entertain you. Some free games are becoming competitive as well, for hardcore gamers that like procrastination (Like Me.) Playing a game is supposed to do three things:
    1. Waste Time
    2. Entertain you and thousands of others
    3. Pay for your Entertainment.

    Free to play games cut out the third step because you do not waste the $5 to, dare I say it, $60 games. Just because a game looks or makes you want to play a related game is not bad and you should not judge upon game-play footage. Ever. Just install it and, “Shaddup And Just Enjoy The Game!”

  • Scarybooster says:

    You could have quoted me I wouldn’t have been offended. I do believe F2P is a bad phrase. There is nothing free about the game and a lot of so called F2P games have ruined the meaning. These companies spend their time and money developing these games and need a way to get paid in the end. They just need to redefine what F2P really means. I was not talking MMO when I said what’s the catch, I was talking F2P. There is always a catch with F2P unless it is educational game.

    • If we get into semantics, you could argue that it costs you money for the internet service you use to download the game, or money for the PC you’re using. But beyond that, there are a TON of games I can play without spending a nickel.

      Are the games made to push you into paying for services? Yes, absolutely. But it doesn’t mean you HAVE to.

      But I do agree that there are a bunch of games that stretch the FTP term, thus clouding the vision of consumers.

      • Scarybooster says:

        I agree, you can play games like Allods and not pay a cent, but you will always be below the curve. Free to play is no strings attached. A great example of F2P is Joe Cartoon’s Spankin’ the Monkey. Allods, LotRO, EQ2X, ect… are not F2P, they are RMT. When a game like Firefall claims to be Free to Play, it sends what if’s up people’s spines. Why don’t they say they will be RMT based game. What is the harm in telling people up front how you plan on paying your staff?

        Again, if Allods said they were going to have a payment model based on cash shop sales, more people would have excepted it wasn’t F2P and RMT. Maybe then, the outragous prices wouldn’t have been such a shock. I know what you are thinking, People knew Allods was an RMT game from looking at the Russian counterpart. Yes, we all knew, but slapping a label like “F2P”, fools the costumer into thinking it is going to be like, Runescape. When people saw the massive cash shop, they deleted the game off their hard drive.

        If companies don’t like the RMT label, come up with a new catch phrase, don’t taint F2P.

      • “Yes, we all knew, but slapping a label like “F2P”, fools the costumer into thinking it is going to be like, Runescape.”

        That’s just it though, it’s a fantastic marketing device and it’s not for people like you or me who play (and pay for) alot of games. It’s for people who see the magic word “free” and check it out without preconcieved notions or speculations as to what they’re really getting into.

  • 5 comments

    1. Sezco Comment:September 14, 2010 at 1:49 am

      There are tons of free games to choose from that could entertain you. Some free games are becoming competitive as well, for hardcore gamers that like procrastination (Like Me.) Playing a game is supposed to do three things:
      1. Waste Time
      2. Entertain you and thousands of others
      3. Pay for your Entertainment.

      Free to play games cut out the third step because you do not waste the $5 to, dare I say it, $60 games. Just because a game looks or makes you want to play a related game is not bad and you should not judge upon game-play footage. Ever. Just install it and, “Shaddup And Just Enjoy The Game!”


    2. Scarybooster Comment:September 14, 2010 at 7:46 am

      You could have quoted me I wouldn’t have been offended. I do believe F2P is a bad phrase. There is nothing free about the game and a lot of so called F2P games have ruined the meaning. These companies spend their time and money developing these games and need a way to get paid in the end. They just need to redefine what F2P really means. I was not talking MMO when I said what’s the catch, I was talking F2P. There is always a catch with F2P unless it is educational game.


    3. Steve "Slurms" Lichtsinn Comment:September 14, 2010 at 7:58 am

      If we get into semantics, you could argue that it costs you money for the internet service you use to download the game, or money for the PC you’re using. But beyond that, there are a TON of games I can play without spending a nickel.

      Are the games made to push you into paying for services? Yes, absolutely. But it doesn’t mean you HAVE to.

      But I do agree that there are a bunch of games that stretch the FTP term, thus clouding the vision of consumers.


    4. Scarybooster Comment:September 14, 2010 at 9:09 am

      I agree, you can play games like Allods and not pay a cent, but you will always be below the curve. Free to play is no strings attached. A great example of F2P is Joe Cartoon’s Spankin’ the Monkey. Allods, LotRO, EQ2X, ect… are not F2P, they are RMT. When a game like Firefall claims to be Free to Play, it sends what if’s up people’s spines. Why don’t they say they will be RMT based game. What is the harm in telling people up front how you plan on paying your staff?

      Again, if Allods said they were going to have a payment model based on cash shop sales, more people would have excepted it wasn’t F2P and RMT. Maybe then, the outragous prices wouldn’t have been such a shock. I know what you are thinking, People knew Allods was an RMT game from looking at the Russian counterpart. Yes, we all knew, but slapping a label like “F2P”, fools the costumer into thinking it is going to be like, Runescape. When people saw the massive cash shop, they deleted the game off their hard drive.

      If companies don’t like the RMT label, come up with a new catch phrase, don’t taint F2P.


    5. Steve "Slurms" Lichtsinn Comment:September 14, 2010 at 9:34 am

      “Yes, we all knew, but slapping a label like “F2P”, fools the costumer into thinking it is going to be like, Runescape.”

      That’s just it though, it’s a fantastic marketing device and it’s not for people like you or me who play (and pay for) alot of games. It’s for people who see the magic word “free” and check it out without preconcieved notions or speculations as to what they’re really getting into.


    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Please fill the required fields...

    You may use: <a href="" title=""></a> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>.